The issue of standards in the provision of care and the role of the Care Quality Commission (CQC) has featured in a number of Prestige Nursing + Care’s blogs. Recent changes in the organisation have led to the Commission’s proposals of a new direction and system of regulation in order to counter past failings. The overhaul of how the quality of care is measured in the UK also aims to guarantee a certain level of protection for those receiving care and ensure that these failings do not happen again.
We fully welcome the admission from the CQC that the quality of care provided to the elderly – both in care homes and in their own homes –has not always been acceptable under its stewardship. In previous blogs we explored the inconsistency of standards across the UK and the need for this to improve. The past two years alone have seen an increase in the number of complaints made by the public about social care provision increase by 46%, which is indicative of a growing disillusionment with the standards of care. Those receiving care should not be made to feel vulnerable, neglected or abused by those who should be helping them – especially in their own homes.
Attitudes within society towards the elderly are also critical – as demonstrated by this piece in The Telegraph – and the introduction of a ‘mum’ test to ensure better treatment of elderly patients may go some way to improving services. Furthermore, an OFSTED-style ratings system, where every provider of home care is ranked from outstanding to inadequate not only chastises the bad in the eyes of the public but also promotes those that provide excellent levels of care. Services deemed to be providing unsatisfactory levels of care will be given the chance to improve but those that fail to do so will be stopped or shut, with management held accountable and unable to work in the sector again. There will also be greater encouragement of feedback from patients and families as a way to add a further check on the system, which can sometimes appear poorly monitored.
While these reforms are clearly a step in the right direction, it is important that they are implemented effectively and efficiently by the Commission. In the past, multiple layers of bureaucracy have often stifled change and can lead to reforms being carried out inconsistently across the country. Consistent standards need to be at the heart of the issue so that any failing provider of care is penalised swiftly rather than allowed to continue providing sub-standard care unchallenged to the most vulnerable. These promises are therefore an encouraging start, but it would be premature to celebrate too much before they have been successfully implemented.